Now that the singularity has been replaced by a finite core, we need to understand how that core evolves when the black hole is not static.
Black holes aren’t static in reality. They can gain mass (by swallowing stars, gas, radiation) or lose mass (through Hawking evaporation). So the question is: if the total mass \(M\) changes, what happens to the core radius \(r_c\)?
From Step 4, the core radius is determined by
\[ r_c^3 = \frac{3 M c^2}{4 \pi \rho_c}. \]
If \(M\) changes, then \(r_c\) must change accordingly. Differentiate both sides with respect to time (or advanced time coordinate \(v\)):
\[ 3 r_c^2 \frac{dr_c}{dv} = \frac{3 c^2}{4\pi \rho_c} \, \frac{dM}{dv}. \]
Simplify:
\[ \boxed{\frac{dr_c}{dv} = \frac{\dot M(v) \, c^2}{4\pi \rho_c \, r_c^2}}. \]
In GR, the Vaidya solution describes a black hole that changes mass due to ingoing or outgoing radiation.
Now we have:
Together, these make the absorbing core a predictive feature: it responds smoothly to infalling matter or outgoing radiation, never diverges, and never needs arbitrary parameters.
Symbol / Term | Meaning | Value | Metaphor |
---|---|---|---|
\(\dot M(v)\) | Time derivative of mass | In/out flux of energy | How fast the black hole is eating or evaporating |
\(dr_c/dv\) | Time derivative of core radius | Given by evolution law | The “breathing” of the core as it absorbs/releases energy |
\(v\) | Advanced time coordinate (regular at horizon) | Variable | A clock that smoothly follows infalling radiation |
Vaidya spacetime | GR solution for a radiating/absorbing black hole | Matches with our flux law | A “dynamic Schwarzschild” tuned by energy flux |
Horizon-regular | Behavior that stays smooth at \(r_h\) | Built-in via lapse-first | Like switching to a camera angle where nothing glitches |
The absorbing core breathes with mass flow, governed by a clean evolution equation tied to energy flux.