Chapter 4 — Deflection from Transverse Time-Gradients

Rays bend where the rate of time changes across the path. The bending tracks transverse gradients of \(\Phi\).

Goal of this chapter

  • Write the bending angle in terms of transverse gradients of \(\Phi\).
  • Show agreement with the classic point-mass result.
  • Connect to thin-lens notation used in weak lensing.

Set-up

Work in the Born approximation. The ray is nearly straight. Use an unperturbed path coordinate \(z\) and a transverse impact parameter \(b\). Define the transverse gradient as \(\nabla_{\!\\perp}\), orthogonal to the line of sight \(\hat{\mathbf n}\).

\[ \nabla_{\!\\perp} \;\equiv\; \bigl(\mathbf I - \hat{\mathbf n}\hat{\mathbf n}^{\\top}\bigr)\nabla. \]

Bending from the temporal–optics map

Fermat’s principle for a slowly varying index gives a small deflection proportional to the cross-path index gradient integrated along the line of sight.

Conventions. The paper shows both \(n=e^{\Phi}\) and \(n_{\gamma}=e^{-2\Phi}\). Use the form that keeps factors correct for your section. They are related by \(n_{\gamma}=n^{-2}\).

Form 1 — using \(n_{\gamma}=e^{-2\Phi}\) (matches the paper’s lensing figures)

\[ \boldsymbol{\alpha}(\hat{\mathbf n}) \;\simeq\; \int \nabla_{\!\\perp}\ln n_{\gamma}\,\mathrm{d}z \;=\; -\,2\int \nabla_{\!\\perp}\Phi\,\mathrm{d}z. \]

Form 2 — using \(n=e^{\Phi}\)

In this convention the same leading-order physics appears as

\[ \boldsymbol{\alpha}(\hat{\mathbf n}) \;\simeq\; 2\int \nabla_{\!\\perp}\Phi\,\mathrm{d}\ell, \]

where the factor of 2 matches the \(\ln n_{\gamma}\) expression above. Use one convention per calculation and keep track of factors.

Worked example: point mass

Take \(\Phi(r)\approx -\,GM/(c^2 r)\) with \(r=\sqrt{b^2+z^2}\). The transverse gradient is \(\nabla_{\!\\perp}\Phi = \partial\Phi/\partial b = (GM/c^2)\, b/r^3\).

\[ \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \frac{b\,\mathrm{d}z}{(b^2+z^2)^{3/2}} \;=\; \frac{2}{b}. \]

Insert this into the \(n_{\gamma}\) form.

\[ \alpha(b) \;\simeq\; -\,2\int \nabla_{\!\\perp}\Phi\,\mathrm{d}z \;=\; -\,2\left(\frac{GM}{c^2}\right)\frac{2}{b}. \]

The direction is toward the mass. The magnitude matches the classic result:

\[ |\alpha(b)| \;=\; \frac{4GM}{c^2 b}. \]

This agrees with the standard weak-field GR prediction.

Thin-lens language

Project the potential along the line of sight. Define a 2D lensing potential \(\psi\) on the sky. Use angular coordinates \(\boldsymbol{\theta}\) with distance factors absorbed in \(\psi\).

\[ \psi(\boldsymbol{\theta}) \;\propto\; \int \Phi\,\mathrm{d}z, \qquad \boldsymbol{\alpha}(\boldsymbol{\theta}) \;=\; \nabla_{\!\\boldsymbol{\theta}}\,\psi(\boldsymbol{\theta}). \]

Convergence and shear follow as derivatives of \(\psi\).

\[ \kappa \;=\; \tfrac{1}{2}\nabla_{\!\\boldsymbol{\theta}}^2 \psi, \qquad \gamma_1,\gamma_2 \;\text{ from second derivatives of }\psi. \]

This matches weak-lensing notation. It links the temporal potential to standard 2D lens maps.

Validity and small parameters

  • Weak field: \(|\Phi|\ll 1\).
  • Small angles: the Born approximation holds.
  • Quasi-static lens: \(\bigl|\partial_t\Phi/\Phi\bigr|\,T_{\mathrm{path}} \ll 1\).
  • Thin lens (optional): \(L_{\mathrm{lens}}/(c\,\tau_{\mathrm{var}})\ll 1\).

Sanity checks

  • Point mass gives \(|\alpha|=4GM/(c^2 b)\).
  • Double the impact parameter. The deflection halves.
  • Set \(\Phi\to 0\). Rays remain straight.

Common pitfalls

  • Mixing \(n=e^{\Phi}\) and \(n_{\gamma}=e^{-2\Phi}\) mid-derivation. Convert with \(n_{\gamma}=n^{-2}\).
  • Dropping the factor of 2 when switching between \(\nabla_{\!\\perp}\ln n_{\gamma}\) and \(\nabla_{\!\\perp}\Phi\).
  • Using a curved path in the integral while assuming the Born approximation.

What you have now

A bending formula tied to cross-path time-gradients. A point-mass check that recovers \(\,4GM/(c^2 b)\,\). A bridge to thin-lens notation.